Skip to main content

Posts

Is the GOP taking COVID-19 seriously?

The president has COVID . A number of his close confidants, including Kellyanne Conway and Chris Christie , have COVID diagnoses of their own. It appears that Supreme Court Nominee Amy Coney Barrett's Rose Garden Nomination Ceremony  was a "superspreader" event that spread COVID among all levels of government -- from the Presidency to the Senate.  There were some key details to the ceremony: it was largely mask-less , it ignored social distancing protocols  and it was a GOP event (I'll get into that later). Descriptions of the event paint a picture of an administration unconcerned with traditional COVID precautions. There were few face masks present and people were seated closely together. Instead, the White House relied on rapid COVID tests, which deliver results in 15 minutes, to screen guests for the Coronavirus prior to entering the Rose Garden.  However, frustratingly, the Trump Administration completely misused these tests -- putting everyone who attended the e...

America's Mental Health

COVID has been tough for all of us. It's been 171 days since the White House declared coronavirus a National Emergency, and life hasn't been the same since. As with any major life change, there are bound to be mental health effects for a lot of us. The CDC even has an entire page  on taking care of your mental health during the pandemic. In fact,  the pandemic has indeed coincided with a mental health crisis,  and mental health is arguably in the public eye more than ever.    In the spirit of this, I thought I would do an article on mental health in America. I use a pre-pandemic survey of roughly 500,000 Americans called the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) collected in 2018-19. Importantly, I don't measure mental health by rate of psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, etc.) in a population. Rather, I measure well-being based on the answer to the survey question:    " Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress...

Do Black Lives Matter to the Police? A Statistical Look

Race has a long and complex history in the United States, perhaps first dating back to 1619 when some "20 and odd" Africans were first brought to the colony of Jamestown.  Since then our rich culture of immigration (some of it, unfortunately forced ) has resulted in a society where 40% of us can be considered "minorities." In fact, less than half of children under 15 are white , indicating a potential shift to a majority-minority society in the future. It goes without saying that minorities have made and continue to make enormous contributions to American society. Despite this, we as a country have a checkered past of treating them. From slavery to internment camps, from the transcontinental railroad to Jim Crow laws, the list really goes on. Given that some of these transgressions, like the Jim Crow laws, occurred just a generation ago, it is not hard to imagine a world where residual sentiments behind them still linger. This brings me to current events. Fro...

Are floods getting worse?

Climate change has far reaching impacts beyond the gradual warming of the earth. The ocean is becoming more acidic , coral reefs are dying , and species are going extinct at alarming rates. In particular, extreme weather events appear to be becoming more common in recent years. Evidence suggests that severe floods and droughts have increased  in certain regions of the United States. Anecdotally, just in the past few years, we've seen historic floods in Houston, the worst natural disaster in recorded history to hit Puerto Rico (Hurricane Maria), and devastating wildfires in Australia, just to name a few. I'm going to take a closer look and see if we can empirically show that flooding has gotten worse in frequency and magnitude in the Southern U.S. Interestingly, I found little scientific research on the subject. So basically. You heard it here first. Flooding Down South The Model I obtained data from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) for the stream/river networ...

Coronavirus: Some Thoughts on the Quarantine

It's been some 45 days since the White House declared COVID-19 a National Emergency and the bulk of us became largely confined to our homes. As people begin to agitate for the end of the quarantine and a number of states begin to open up, I thought I'd offer up a loose collection of data-driven thoughts on the quarantine we've all been experiencing. These insights are based on mobility data measured as Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). While this is an imperfect metric, we can use the reduction in VMT since before the pandemic as a rough proxy of how effectively we have been adhering to the quarantine. The Quarantine Was Effective, but Effectiveness Varied by State The first observation is that the quarantine was effective, which is probably obvious from a quick glance outside. Average mobility by county fell by approximately 65% when compared to January (the troughs you see are weekends). Some states adhered to the quarantine more seriously than others ...

Coronavirus: How are we doing?

Unless you live under a rock, you've heard of COVID-19, colloquially known as Coronavirus (or, if you prefer,  Caronavirus ). Your state may have multiple confirmed cases, and you may be under quarantine and working from home. You might even have it and passed it to others in your life . In any way, it has undoubtedly affected your life at this point as it has taken the world by storm: Perhaps the headline of Coronavirus in the United States has been the Federal Government's alleged mishandling of the virus as it reached our shores. From faulty test kits to contradicting statements from our Commander-in-Chief, it's hard to say that the response has been stellar. I wanted to see if we can statistically show that the government's conduct in these trying times has had a measurable impact on outcomes for U.S. residents. First, I'll start off by listing reasons why this exercise is a fair one and not some political witch-hunt. In the lead-up to the pandemic, the ...

Coronavirus: How are we doing? (methodology)

To create my metric, I make use of a 2-parameter model pioneered by Viboud et. al . Specifically, it measures number of cases on day  t, C(t),  using the following parameters:  r  is a measure of growth rate,  A  is a constant, and the "deceleration of growth parameter" is given by $p = 1-\frac{1}{m}$, where  p  is between 0 and 1. Specifically,  p  has unique properties. If  p  is equal to 0, then the cumulative number of cases grows  linearly.  If  p  is equal to 1, then the cumulative number of cases grows  exponentially.  Everything in-between displays  sub-exponential  growth. Cases with sub-exponential growth can be modeled using the following formula: $C(t)=(\frac{r}{m}t+A)^{m}$ r  and  p  can be estimated by applying current data and nonlinear least squares (NLS) to the above formula. In practice, as  p  approaches 0, a plot of cumulative cases is...